Reviewer Guideline

1. General Principles

• The review must be fair, confidential, and impartial.

• Avoid personal criticism of the author; focus only on the quality of the manuscript.

• Do not use any information from the manuscript for personal purposes.

2. Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers should evaluate the manuscript on the following points:

1. Originality & Novelty: Does the research contribute something new?

2. Relevance: Is the paper relevant to the scope of the journal?

3. Structure & Organization: Is the manuscript well-organized with clear sections (Abstract, Introduction, Methodology, Results, Conclusion)?

4. Methodology: Are the research methods appropriate and reliable?

5. References: Are the references recent, relevant, and correctly cited?

6. Language & Presentation: Is the paper clearly written and easy to understand?

3. Reviewer’s Recommendation

At the end of the review, the reviewer should choose one of the following recommendations:

• Accept

• Minor Revision

• Major Revision

• Reject

4. Ethical Responsibilities

• Disclose any conflicts of interest to the editor immediately.

• Report if you detect plagiarism, duplicate submission, or ethical misconduct.

• Maintain the confidentiality of the manuscript at all times.

5. Timeframe

• Reviews should be completed within the allotted time and submitted to the editors promptly.

• If unable to complete the review on time, the reviewer should notify the editor in advance.